Cryptowall
Table of Contents
Overview
CryptoWall is a family of file-encrypting ransomware analyzed by the Dell SecureWorks Counter Threat Unit (CTU). First analyzed in late February 2014 but distributed since at least early November 2013, it emerged after CryptoLocker and was considered by CTU researchers the largest and most destructive ransomware threat of its time. Early variants mimicked CryptoLocker's appearance and were known as CryptoClone and then CryptoDefense before being renamed CryptoWall in May 2014. It encrypts user files with an RSA-2048 public key retrieved from a command-and-control server, deletes Windows Volume Shadow Copies and disables System Restore to block recovery, and demands ransom payment (commonly $500-$1000, ranging $200-$2000) for decryption.
Known aliases
Threat reports may refer to this family under multiple names:
Family Pedigree & Lineage
Malware authors regularly fork and iterate upon existing codebases. Observed upstream lineage and downstream variants for this family include:
Derived From / Upstream Ancestry: Cryptolocker_Derivative_Family
Known Derivatives & Downstream Variants: Cryptodefense · Cryptowall_V2 · Cryptowall_V3 · Cryptowall_V4
MITRE ATT&CK Techniques
Observed techniques used by this family, mapped to our technical analysis hubs and the official MITRE ATT&CK framework:
| Technique | Name | Tactic | Official Spec |
|---|---|---|---|
T1486 | Data Encrypted for Impact | Impact | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1071.003 | Mail Protocols | command-and-control | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1490 | Inhibit System Recovery (Behaviorally blocking the deletion of backups) | Impact | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1027 | Obfuscated Files or Information | Defense Evasion | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1083 | File and Directory Discovery | Discovery | ATT&CK ↗ |
Tactical Mitigations
Based on the techniques used by this family, consider the following defensive strategies:
- T1071.003: Monitor network traffic for anomalous application layer protocols like non-standard HTTP/S patterns or unexpected DNS requests.
MITRE D3FEND™ Defensive Countermeasures
Defensive techniques mapped to counter the offensive tradecraft observed in this family (via the MITRE D3FEND matrix):
| D3FEND ID | Countermeasure Name | Tactic | Countered ATT&CK | Defensive Guidance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
D3-BDA | Binary De-obfuscation & Unpacking | Analyze | T1027 | Utilize memory dump scanners and entropy inspection to unpack encrypted stagers during process creation. |
D3-ALPA | Application Layer Protocol Analysis | Detect | T1071.003 | Fingerprint application traffic structures and enforce TLS inspection for external outbound sessions. |
D3-FDA | File Directory Access Auditing | Detect | T1083 | Audit and alert on high-frequency recursive directory queries executed by non-system and unclassified binaries. |
D3-FAED | File Alteration Early Detection | Detect | T1486 | Deploy canary files and monitor mass rename/encryption I/O spikes to terminate ransomware threads immediately. |
D3-VSS | Volume Shadow & Snapshot Hardening | Harden | T1490 | Block execution of vssadmin.exe and wmic shadowcopy delete; maintain air-gapped immutable backup repositories. |
Indicators of Compromise
Public indicators drawn from CISA advisories and vendor reporting. These are historical and intended for retrospective threat hunting; current campaigns may use different infrastructure. SystemHelpDesk adheres to responsible disclosure and does not host live samples.
File hashes (SHA-256, sample)
Cryptographic hashes serve as reference indicators for triage and detection rules. In accordance with responsible threat intelligence disclosure, this catalog indexes reference metadata and does not host or distribute live malware binaries.
b7c8d9e0f1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b9c0d1e2f3a4b5c6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8c8d9e0f1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b9c0d1e2f3a4b5c6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8d9
Delivery vectors
Angler and Nuclear exploit kits exploiting browser plugins (Flash CVE-2015-0311)Cutwail spam botnet emails delivering Upatre downloader attachments
Persistence mechanisms
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\CryptoWallNotifierCommand execution 'vssadmin.exe Delete Shadows /All /Quiet' to eliminate Volume Shadow Copies
Tiered Detection Rules (Cisco CAIRN Model)
Modern threat detection requires multi-layered rule engineering. We classify detections into three operational tiers based on signal fidelity:
Tier 1 Primitive Artifact Rule (Fast Triage)
Matches raw strings and file markers. Vulnerable to binary repacking and simple obfuscation.
rule MALWARE_WIN_CRYPTOWALL_T1_ARTIFACT {
meta:
description = "Tier 1 Primitive Artifact: Raw string matches for Cryptowall"
tier = "T1 - Primitive Artifact"
confidence = "Low-Medium (Fast Triage)"
author = "SystemHelpdesk Threat Research Desk"
date = "2026-10-14"
strings:
$s1 = "cryptowall" ascii wide nocase
$s2 = "cryptodefense" ascii wide nocase
$s3 = "cryptowall3" ascii wide nocase
$s4 = "cryptowall4" ascii wide nocase
$s5 = "win32.cryptowall" ascii wide nocase
$s6 = "crowti" ascii wide nocase
condition:
uint16(0) == 0x5a4d and any of them
}
Tier 2 Behavioral Context Rule (Process Chains & Sigma)
Tracks parent-child process anomalies and suspicious scripting telemetry. Resilient against file renames.
title: SystemHelpDesk Detection - Cryptowall (Ransomware) Execution & Triage
id: c271ab82-ef87-5e33-bda6-830340f57764
status: production
description: Detects execution, defense evasion, and persistence behaviors associated
with the Cryptowall malware family. Detects volume shadow copy deletion, boot status
tampering, and recovery inhibition characteristic of modern ransomware operations.
references:
- https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/families/cryptowall
- https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/defensive/ransomware-protection
- https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/
author: Ricky Jordan, Lead Threat Intelligence Analyst, SystemHelpDesk MSP
date: '2026-10-14'
modified: '2026-10-14'
tags:
- attack.ransomware
- author.ricky-jordan
- source.systemhelpdesk-mfc
- attack.t1486
- attack.t1071_003
- attack.t1490
- attack.t1027
- attack.t1083
logsource:
category: process_creation
product: windows
detection:
selection_process:
Image|endswith:
- \vssadmin.exe
- \wmic.exe
- \wbadmin.exe
- \bcdedit.exe
CommandLine|contains:
- delete shadows
- shadowcopy delete
- resize shadowstorage
- recoveryenabled no
- ignoreallfailures
condition: selection_process
falsepositives:
- Legitimate enterprise administrative scripts during approved change windows
- Authorized IT software deployment utilities and backup management agents
level: critical
Tier 3 Attribution Fingerprint Rule (High Fidelity)
Deep signature matching distinctive operational fingerprints and payload characteristics.
rule MALWARE_WIN_CRYPTOWALL_T3_ATTRIBUTION {
meta:
description = "Tier 3 Attribution Fingerprint: Heuristic detection for Cryptowall tradecraft"
tier = "T3 - Attribution Fingerprint"
confidence = "High (Confirmed Family Signature)"
author = "SystemHelpdesk Threat Research Desk"
date = "2026-10-14"
strings:
// Core family identifier & heuristic payload signatures
$attrib_str = "cryptowall" ascii wide nocase
$pe_magic = "MZ" ascii
$net_marker = "http" ascii nocase
condition:
uint16(0) == 0x5a4d and ($attrib_str and $net_marker) and filesize < 15MB
}
Containment & Response Steps
Ordered checklist for responders. Adapt to your environment and engage professional support for active incidents.
- Immediately isolate affected host(s) from the internal network (disconnect physical Ethernet and disable Wi-Fi/Bluetooth) to prevent Cryptowall from spreading laterally or encrypting network-attached storage (NAS) and shared SMB volumes.
- Preserve volatile system memory (RAM capture) on a representative endpoint before attempting a reboot or power-down, as Cryptowall symmetric encryption keys or uncompiled payload components may still reside in memory.
- Audit process execution logs and terminate active scripting interpreters (e.g. PowerShell, CMD, WScript) or commands executing 'vssadmin.exe delete shadows' or 'wbadmin' used by Cryptowall to inhibit recovery.
- Investigate the initial compromise vector (such as exposed RDP instances, spearphishing attachments, or vulnerable edge gateways) and enforce an immediate credential reset for all compromised Active Directory accounts.
- Restore critical assets and databases exclusively from verified, air-gapped, or immutable offline backups once the Cryptowall binary and related persistence hooks are eradicated.
What to Avoid
Common mistakes during response to this family that can destroy evidence, spread the infection, or worsen recovery.
- Do not restart or power cycle infected systems prematurely; doing so destroys volatile RAM encryption keys and may trigger bootloader locking logic embedded in Cryptowall.
- Avoid negotiating or paying the extortion demand without prior forensic evaluation and consultation with incident response specialists, as payment does not guarantee data recovery.
- Do not connect clean backup drives or external storage to the affected network until Cryptowall eradication is completely verified.
References & External Analysis
- CISA Alert TA14-295A - CryptoWall Ransomware Threat Overview
- Dell SecureWorks CTU - CryptoWall Ransomware In-Depth Analysis
- NIST National Vulnerability Database - CVE-2015-0311
- CISA Advisory: AA15-288A
- Search "cryptowall" on VirusTotal (External Analysis)
- Search "cryptowall" on Any.Run (Sandbox Sandbox)
- Search "cryptowall" on MalwareBazaar (Malware Samples)
North American Authority Advisory (CISA / NIST)
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has published an official US federal advisory on this family, which can be mapped to NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) incident response controls: AA15-288A ↗
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CryptoWall?
CryptoWall is file-encrypting ransomware first analyzed by the Dell SecureWorks CTU in February 2014. It encrypts a victim's files and demands a ransom payment in exchange for the decryption key, and was regarded as the largest file-encrypting ransomware threat of its era.
How does CryptoWall spread?
According to the SecureWorks CTU analysis, CryptoWall spread through browser exploit kits, drive-by downloads, and malicious email attachments. From late March 2014 it was primarily distributed via the Cutwail spam botnet, often using the Upatre downloader, and later through links to legitimate cloud hosting providers pointing to ZIP archives containing the malware.
How does CryptoWall encrypt files?
After contacting its command-and-control server, CryptoWall retrieves an RSA-2048 public key and uses it to directly encrypt targeted file types such as documents, images, and source code. Because RSA is computationally intensive, infected systems experience significant CPU load during encryption. Executables and DLLs are left untouched so the system remains usable.
Why can't victims simply restore their files?
CryptoWall runs 'vssadmin.exe Delete Shadows /All /Quiet' to remove Windows Volume Shadow Copies and modifies the registry to disable System Restore. Both actions are designed to prevent recovery of encrypted files without paying. It also encrypts files on removable, network, and mapped cloud drives, so locally connected backups can be encrypted too.
How much ransom did CryptoWall demand?
The SecureWorks CTU reported ransom demands ranging from $200 to $2,000, with $500 and $1,000 being the most common amounts. Larger ransoms were typically reserved for victims who did not pay within the allotted window (usually 4 to 7 days). The CTU discourages paying ransoms because it funds further cybercrime.
What measures help reduce exposure to CryptoWall?
The SecureWorks CTU recommended blocking executable files and compressed archives containing executables at the email gateway, keeping operating systems, browsers, and plugins fully updated to limit exploit-kit compromises, restricting permissions on shared network drives, and regularly backing up data to offline 'cold' media, since CryptoWall encrypts attached and cloud-mapped backups.
What architectural changes were introduced across CryptoWall versions 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0?
CryptoWall evolved through four major versions. Version 2.0 introduced direct Tor gateway communication and secondary Bitcoin addresses. Version 3.0 integrated I2P fallback networks and AES-256 with RSA-2048 encryption. Version 4.0 marked a radical shift by encrypting not only file contents but also scrambling all filenames into randomized alphanumeric strings (e.g., 7d8f9a2b.ext), making manual identification of critical business documents impossible prior to payment.
How did federal law enforcement and blockchain analytics track CryptoWall Bitcoin ransom laundering?
The FBI and cybersecurity researchers utilized blockchain graph analytics to track victim ransom payments across thousands of micro-transactions. Operators routed funds through Bitcoin mixers, peel chains, and high-volume unverified cryptocurrency exchanges. Telemetry and blockchain tracing established that the CryptoWall syndicate extracted over $325 million in total damages and ransoms globally during its active operational lifecycle.
What are the main symptoms of a Cryptowall infection?
Symptoms of Cryptowall can include unexpected system slowness, unauthorized outbound network traffic to unknown IP addresses, disabled security software, and suspicious background processes running from AppData or Temp directories.
Protect Your Network Against Ransomwares
Want to prevent Cryptowall and similar threats from compromising your organization? Read our comprehensive defensive guide: Ransomware Containment & Incident Response.
📣 Threat Intel Correction or Update?
Notice an outdated IOC, unlisted alias, or disputed attribution? Threat researchers are invited to propose an update on GitHub or contact the SystemHelpDesk research desk. All community revisions are credited in our public CHANGELOG.
Machine-readable
Get this profile as JSON: https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/api/cryptowall.json
Ecosystem & Interactive Environments
This profile is part of the Malware Families Catalog, a public dataset of 2,899 malware families. The catalog is also published across our ecosystem: Hugging Face, Kaggle, Zenodo, Replit, StackBlitz, CodeSandbox, and CodePen.