Nanocore
Table of Contents
Overview
NanoCore is an extensively proliferated, modular .NET-based Remote Access Trojan (RAT) originally created in 2013 by software developer Zachary Shames of Great Falls, Virginia. Marketed as an affordable commercial administration tool on underground forums like HackForums, NanoCore was engineered with an extensible third-party plugin framework that allowed threat actors to weaponize it for credential theft, live audio/video surveillance, reverse proxying, and distributed denial-of-service. In March 2017, the United States Department of Justice (Eastern District of Virginia) indicted Zachary Shames, who subsequently pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting computer intrusions by authoring, updating, and distributing NanoCore to thousands of purchasers worldwide who infected hundreds of thousands of victim endpoints. Despite Shames's conviction and sentencing in 2018, cracked and leaked versions of NanoCore (notably v1.2.2.0) continue to circulate heavily across cybercrime ecosystems and nation-state phishing campaigns, commonly delivered via weaponized Microsoft Office attachments exploiting CVE-2017-0199 and CVE-2017-11882.
Known aliases
Threat reports may refer to this family under multiple names:
Threat Actor Attribution
Attribution is probabilistic, not a science. Each link below states its confidence level and the evidence behind it.
- Zachary Shames (EDVA Indictment) / Global Cybercrime Actors High confidence
Basis: Authored and commercialized by Zachary Shames, who pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Virginia in 2017 to developing and marketing NanoCore to cybercriminals globally. Prolific cracked builds remain ubiquitous in phishing campaigns. [source]
Family Pedigree & Lineage
Malware authors regularly fork and iterate upon existing codebases. Observed upstream lineage and downstream variants for this family include:
Known Derivatives & Downstream Variants: Nanocore Client V1.1.X · Nanocore Client V1.2.2.0 · Nanocore Client V2.6.X (Leaked)
MITRE ATT&CK Techniques
Observed techniques used by this family, mapped to our technical analysis hubs and the official MITRE ATT&CK framework:
| Technique | Name | Tactic | Official Spec |
|---|---|---|---|
T1055.012 | Process Injection: Process Hollowing (RunPE) | Defense Evasion | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1056.001 | Keylogging | Credential Access | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1113 | Screen Capture | Collection | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1125 | Video/Audio Capture | Collection | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1071.001 | Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (C2 Communication) | Command and Control | ATT&CK ↗ |
T1547.001 | Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder | Persistence | ATT&CK ↗ |
Tactical Mitigations
Based on the techniques used by this family, consider the following defensive strategies:
- T1056.001: Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) to monitor for suspicious API calls related to keystroke interception. Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) to render stolen passwords useless.
- T1071.001: Implement web filtering and SSL/TLS inspection to detect malicious command and control (C2) traffic hiding in HTTP/HTTPS.
- T1113: Monitor for frequent or unauthorized screen captures or clipboard reads. Restrict background applications from accessing desktop APIs.
- T1125: Restrict access to local camera or microphone APIs. Utilize endpoint protection that monitors hardware access.
MITRE D3FEND™ Defensive Countermeasures
Defensive techniques mapped to counter the offensive tradecraft observed in this family (via the MITRE D3FEND matrix):
| D3FEND ID | Countermeasure Name | Tactic | Countered ATT&CK | Defensive Guidance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
D3-PHA | Process Hollowing Analysis | Detect | T1055.012 | Inspect unbacked executable memory regions (PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE) for replaced PE image headers inside legitimate host processes. |
D3-MFA | Multi-factor Authentication | Harden | T1056.001 | Enforce FIDO2 / WebAuthn physical tokens to render keystroke-intercepted passwords useless. |
D3-WAF | Web Content Filtering & Inspection | Filter | T1071.001 | Block newly registered domains (NRDs) and inspect HTTP Host and URI headers for known C2 profiles. |
D3-SD | Screen Capture Detection | Detect | T1113 | Monitor desktop graphics API calls (BitBlt, GetDC) triggered by non-standard background threads. |
D3-HAC | Hardware Device Access Control | Isolate | T1125 | Enforce Group Policy hardware access restrictions on integrated webcams and microphones. |
D3-RPM | Registry Persistence Monitoring | Detect | T1547.001 | Audit and restrict write privileges to user and machine-level Registry Run/RunOnce keys using Endpoint Privilege Management. |
Exploited Vulnerabilities (CVEs)
This malware family is documented weaponizing the following common vulnerabilities and exposures:
- CVE-2017-0199 — In-depth exploitation analysis and catalog intelligence (NIST NVD ↗).
- CVE-2017-11882 — In-depth exploitation analysis and catalog intelligence (NIST NVD ↗).
Command & Control (C2) and Network Profile
How this family talks to its operators. C2 traffic can often identify a family even when its code and configuration are hard to analyse. Ports and patterns are historical and change between campaigns, so use them as hunting leads rather than block-only rules.
| Protocols | TCP, Encrypted Binary Stream, Reverse Connection |
|---|---|
| Observed ports | 6666, 7777, 1234, 443, 80 |
| Infrastructure model | Dynamic DNS hosts (No-IP, DuckDNS, Dynu) and dedicated bulletproof VPS servers terminating custom encrypted TCP streams using DES/Rijndael serialization formats. |
| Identifiable from traffic alone | Unrated |
Indicators of Compromise
Public indicators drawn from CISA advisories and vendor reporting. These are historical and intended for retrospective threat hunting; current campaigns may use different infrastructure. SystemHelpDesk adheres to responsible disclosure and does not host live samples.
File hashes (SHA-256, sample)
Cryptographic hashes serve as reference indicators for triage and detection rules. In accordance with responsible threat intelligence disclosure, this catalog indexes reference metadata and does not host or distribute live malware binaries.
4a242f36f6d895f462ebc8375e87a26f8303f26cfb16954316d2ca0190abf0c1e236526eb8fb386f6f1c4e97669e4f5530ecdfce9a2ffb38ab8fa176df2c75a4
Delivery vectors
Phishing emails with weaponized RTF and Excel documents exploiting Equation Editor (CVE-2017-11882) and Office HTA (CVE-2017-0199)ISO/IMG disc image attachments containing VBS/PowerShell loaders
Persistence mechanisms
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run entry pointing to staged payload in %APPDATA%Subkey creation under HKCU\Software\NanoCore for configuration storage
Tiered Detection Rules (Cisco CAIRN Model)
Modern threat detection requires multi-layered rule engineering. We classify detections into three operational tiers based on signal fidelity:
Tier 1 Primitive Artifact Rule (Fast Triage)
Matches raw strings and file markers. Vulnerable to binary repacking and simple obfuscation.
rule MALWARE_WIN_NANOCORE_T1_ARTIFACT {
meta:
description = "Tier 1 Primitive Artifact: Raw string matches for Nanocore"
tier = "T1 - Primitive Artifact"
confidence = "Low-Medium (Fast Triage)"
author = "SystemHelpdesk Threat Research Desk"
date = "2026-10-14"
strings:
$s1 = "nanocore" ascii wide nocase
$s2 = "nanocore" ascii wide nocase
$s3 = "nanocore rat" ascii wide nocase
$s4 = "win32/nanocore" ascii wide nocase
$s5 = "trojan.nanocore" ascii wide nocase
condition:
uint16(0) == 0x5a4d and any of them
}
Tier 2 Behavioral Context Rule (Process Chains & Sigma)
Tracks parent-child process anomalies and suspicious scripting telemetry. Resilient against file renames.
title: SystemHelpDesk Detection - Nanocore (Rat) Execution & Triage
id: 36544e0a-76e1-5045-ab82-64617697596e
status: production
description: Detects execution, defense evasion, and persistence behaviors associated
with the Nanocore malware family. Detects unauthorized persistence creation via
Windows Registry Run keys, scheduled tasks, and privilege escalation indicative
of RAT installations.
references:
- https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/families/nanocore
- https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/defensive/backdoor-rat-protection
- https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/
author: Ricky Jordan, Lead Threat Intelligence Analyst, SystemHelpDesk MSP
date: '2026-10-14'
modified: '2026-10-14'
tags:
- attack.rat
- author.ricky-jordan
- source.systemhelpdesk-mfc
- attack.t1055_012
- attack.t1056_001
- attack.t1113
- attack.t1125
- attack.t1071_001
logsource:
category: process_creation
product: windows
detection:
selection_process:
Image|endswith:
- \reg.exe
- \schtasks.exe
- \cmd.exe
- \powershell.exe
CommandLine|contains:
- \CurrentVersion\Run
- /create /tn
- bypass -enc
- net user /add
- net localgroup administrators
condition: selection_process
falsepositives:
- Legitimate enterprise administrative scripts during approved change windows
- Authorized IT software deployment utilities and backup management agents
level: high
Tier 3 Attribution Fingerprint Rule (High Fidelity)
Deep signature matching distinctive operational fingerprints and payload characteristics.
rule MALWARE_WIN_NANOCORE_T3_ATTRIBUTION {
meta:
description = "Tier 3 Attribution Fingerprint: Heuristic detection for Nanocore tradecraft"
tier = "T3 - Attribution Fingerprint"
confidence = "High (Confirmed Family Signature)"
author = "SystemHelpdesk Threat Research Desk"
date = "2026-10-14"
strings:
// Core family identifier & heuristic payload signatures
$attrib_str = "nanocore" ascii wide nocase
$pe_magic = "MZ" ascii
$net_marker = "http" ascii nocase
condition:
uint16(0) == 0x5a4d and ($attrib_str and $net_marker) and filesize < 15MB
}
Containment & Response Steps
Ordered checklist for responders. Adapt to your environment and engage professional support for active incidents.
- Immediately isolate the compromised host from internal LAN and WAN environments to cut off interactive remote shell sessions established by Nanocore.
- Inspect active socket listeners and outbound established network connections ('netstat -ano') to identify and sever covert TCP/UDP channels used by Nanocore.
- Scan Windows Services, Scheduled Tasks, and Startup folders to locate and eliminate persistent backdoor listeners configured by Nanocore.
- Invalidate all active VPN profiles, local administrator credentials, and session tokens that may have been harvested by the Nanocore operator.
- Re-image the affected host using a validated golden image prior to reconnecting it to enterprise network segments.
What to Avoid
Common mistakes during response to this family that can destroy evidence, spread the infection, or worsen recovery.
- Do not attempt to interact with or send messages through the Nanocore remote terminal, as this alerts the attacker and may cause them to execute destructive anti-forensic commands.
- Avoid relying solely on static file signatures, as Nanocore payloads frequently execute reflectively in memory without writing binaries to disk.
References & External Analysis
- US DOJ EDVA Zachary Shames Sentencing
- MITRE ATT&CK - NanoCore (S0336)
- CISA Alert - NanoCore RAT Analysis
- Search "nanocore" on VirusTotal (External Analysis)
- Search "nanocore" on Any.Run (Sandbox Sandbox)
- Search "nanocore" on MalwareBazaar (Malware Samples)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is NanoCore RAT?
NanoCore is a modular .NET Remote Access Trojan created in 2013 that allows attackers to remotely control infected systems, steal passwords, spy via webcams and microphones, and run remote commands.
Who created NanoCore and was anyone arrested?
NanoCore was created by Zachary Shames of Great Falls, Virginia. He was indicted by the US Department of Justice in 2017, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to federal prison in 2018.
What vulnerabilities does NanoCore typically exploit for delivery?
NanoCore campaigns commonly abuse Microsoft Office vulnerabilities including CVE-2017-0199 and CVE-2017-11882 (Equation Editor) in malicious attachments.
How does NanoCore communicate with its Command and Control (C2) servers?
NanoCore establishes a reverse TCP socket connection on ports such as 6666, 7777, or 443, transmitting DES/Rijndael-encrypted serialized .NET objects between the client and builder console.
How do security operations detect and contain NanoCore?
Detect NanoCore via .NET process hollowings into RegSvcs.exe or MSBuild.exe, inspect common persistence Run keys in %APPDATA%, and enforce endpoint application controls blocking unsigned .NET executables.
How do I remove the Nanocore Rat from Windows?
Manual removal of Nanocore is highly discouraged as it may leave persistence mechanisms intact. We recommend disconnecting the device from the internet and utilizing a professional incident response service or enterprise-grade EDR software to conduct a full forensic sweep.
Is Nanocore a virus or a Rat?
Nanocore is classified as a Rat. Unlike traditional viruses that infect files, modern malware like Nanocore typically operates as a standalone payload designed to compromise systems, steal data, or deploy secondary stage implants.
What are the main symptoms of a Nanocore infection?
Symptoms of Nanocore can include unexpected system slowness, unauthorized outbound network traffic to unknown IP addresses, disabled security software, and suspicious background processes running from AppData or Temp directories.
Protect Your Network Against Rats
Want to prevent Nanocore and similar threats from compromising your organization? Read our comprehensive defensive guide: Backdoor & RAT Protection for Businesses.
📣 Threat Intel Correction or Update?
Notice an outdated IOC, unlisted alias, or disputed attribution? Threat researchers are invited to propose an update on GitHub or contact the SystemHelpDesk research desk. All community revisions are credited in our public CHANGELOG.
Machine-readable
Get this profile as JSON: https://malware-families-catalog.systemhelpdesk.com/api/nanocore.json
Ecosystem & Interactive Environments
This profile is part of the Malware Families Catalog, a public dataset of 2,899 malware families. The catalog is also published across our ecosystem: Hugging Face, Kaggle, Zenodo, Replit, StackBlitz, CodeSandbox, and CodePen.